Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers before 1998-10-06 01:34

Sept. 28, 1998

• Fix for pg_views/pg_rules and new system views Jan Wieck (22:07)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (23:58)

Sept. 29, 1998

• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Vince Vielhaber (00:28)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (01:46)
• SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Robert Bruccoleri (03:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Little parser question Thomas G. Lockhart (04:30)
• pg_dump Thomas G. Lockhart (04:39)
• ecpg parser Thomas G. Lockhart (05:28)
• PL/pgSQL in template1? Jan Wieck (07:30)
• Patch - please apply Jan Wieck (10:03)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Vince Vielhaber (10:09)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (12:06)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (12:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply The Hermit Hacker (12:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump Tom Lane (12:55)
• Re: Antwort: [HACKERS] ecpg parser Thomas G. Lockhart (12:55)
• rules ON SELECT Jan Wieck (12:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply Jan Wieck (13:07)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Taral (14:32)
• SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (14:53)
• Re: SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Robert Bruccoleri (15:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? David Hartwig (16:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart (16:46)
• RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (17:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? Jan Wieck (17:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? Keith Parks (21:22)

Sept. 30, 1998

• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart (01:47)
• Re: Antwort: [HACKERS] ecpg parser Michael Meskes (05:47)
• Patches for gram.y and keywords.c Thomas G. Lockhart (05:54)
• Windows NT port: what file are created by initdb? Joost Kraaijeveld (08:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jose' Soares (10:14)
• initdb question Joost Kraaijeveld (13:47)
• Re: Antwort: Patches for gram.y and keywords.c Thomas G. Lockhart (15:28)
• RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (15:30)
• RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (15:47)
• Make error in current cvs. Jackson, DeJuan (16:09)
• [No subject] Sergio Brandano (16:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Jan Wieck (16:48)
• RE: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Jackson, DeJuan (16:48)

Oct. 1, 1998

• Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply The Hermit Hacker (03:36)
• [No subject] Alexzander Blashko (06:51)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (10:44)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (10:53)
• Patch for libpgtcl Jan Wieck (11:06)
• Initdb questions Windows NT port Joost Kraaijeveld (12:36)
• Having problems compiling postgres on IRIX Henrique Silva (15:17)
• RE: [ADMIN] Having problems compiling postgres on IRIX Jackson, DeJuan (16:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump Matthew C. Aycock (19:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Bruce Momjian (21:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Bruce Momjian (21:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Little parser question Bruce Momjian (22:51)
• Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? Bruce Momjian (22:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Bruce Momjian (22:58)
• Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Taral (23:45)

Oct. 2, 1998

• Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Tom Lane (00:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Tom Lane (00:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Vadim Mikheev (01:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] rules ON SELECT Bruce Momjian (01:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch for libpgtcl Tom Lane (01:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Tom Lane (01:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Bruce Momjian (01:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Bruce Momjian (01:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] initdb question Bruce Momjian (02:01)
• Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (02:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Bruce Momjian (02:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Bruce Momjian (02:25)
• delete from ..;vacuum crashes Tatsuo Ishii (03:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump Thomas G. Lockhart (05:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart (05:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Bruce Momjian (05:10)
• regproc fix Bruce Momjian (05:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Bruce Momjian (05:34)
• RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Taral (05:35)
• Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (06:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] delete from ..;vacuum crashes Tom Lane (06:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] functional indexes Bruce Momjian (06:16)
• Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian (06:18)
• Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers (fwd) Bruce Momjian (06:23)
• I can't find v6.4 Jose' Soares (07:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Jan Wieck (10:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items D'Arcy J.M. Cain (11:29)
• Patch - please apply Jan Wieck (12:20)
• Re: Having problems compiling postgres on IRIX Robert Bruccoleri (12:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump Matthew C. Aycock (13:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] functional indexes Jan Wieck (13:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Tom Lane (14:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Tom Lane (14:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] delete from ..;vacuum crashes Tatsuo Ishii (14:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] regproc fix Thomas G. Lockhart (14:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] delete from ..;vacuum crashes Tom Lane (14:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian (14:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Bruce Momjian (14:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] regproc fix Bruce Momjian (14:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian (14:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] regproc fix Bruce Momjian (15:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] spinlock code for ns32k (again) Bruce Momjian (15:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] regproc fix Thomas G. Lockhart (15:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] regproc fix Bruce Momjian (15:31)
• patching utilities? Thomas G. Lockhart (15:40)
• RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (15:41)
• RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (15:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Jan Wieck (15:45)
• indices: ~* / text_ops Bernhard Lorenz (16:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Bruce Momjian (16:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Bruce Momjian (16:09)
• Re: SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Bruce Momjian (16:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart (16:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply Bruce Momjian (16:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] regproc fix Thomas G. Lockhart (16:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] patching utilities? Bruce Momjian (16:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian (16:26)
• RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Taral (16:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] indices: ~* / text_ops Bruce Momjian (16:37)
• Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (16:40)
• RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Taral (16:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] patching utilities? Thomas G. Lockhart (16:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Jan Wieck (17:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (17:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (17:58)
• documentation changes Bruce Momjian (18:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Jan Wieck (19:05)
• Bug, index problem?? Terry Mackintosh (20:00)
• egcs, glibc-2.0.7, linux - any problems known? teunis (20:08)
• RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Taral (21:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian (21:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (21:39)
• RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Taral (21:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (21:57)
• Bug in contrib/spi/refint.c Anand Surelia (21:57)
• Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian (21:58)
• RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Taral (22:04)
• Re: [GENERAL] Bug in contrib/spi/refint.c Bruce Momjian (22:36)

Oct. 3, 1998

• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (03:01)
• Re: Antwort: Patches for gram.y and keywords.c Thomas G. Lockhart (05:23)
• Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Bruce Momjian (05:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 Items Bruce Momjian (05:50)
• Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian (06:05)
• too many pfree in large object Tatsuo Ishii (14:30)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/doc README.ipaddr' Bruce Momjian (14:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] bug in "fetch" command? Thomas G. Lockhart (15:47)
• need help with csh Thomas G. Lockhart (18:58)
• Dumping of views -- done! Terry Mackintosh (20:25)

Oct. 4, 1998

• IP test program Bruce Momjian (01:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! Bruce Momjian (01:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (01:57)
• RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Taral (02:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! Terry Mackintosh (02:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! Terry Mackintosh (03:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) Bruce Momjian (03:32)
• Re: IP test program Thomas G. Lockhart (04:18)
• UnixWare 7.x port updates. Billy G. Allie (09:30)
• [No subject] Sergio Brandano (14:13)
• [No subject] Sergio Brandano (14:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.x port updates. Thomas G. Lockhart (14:58)
• tcl support broken Egon Schmid (15:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.x port updates. Bruce Momjian (15:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.x port updates. Bruce Momjian (15:39)
• plpgsql is not ready for prime time Tom Lane (20:00)
• RE: [HACKERS] plpgsql is not ready for prime time Stupor Genius (20:12)
• TCL_ARRAYS code in libpgtcl is pretty seriously broken Tom Lane (22:24)
• Re: pg_dump new -n flag Thomas G. Lockhart (22:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Marc G. Fournier (23:52)

Oct. 5, 1998

• Re: [HACKERS] TCL_ARRAYS code in libpgtcl is pretty seriously broken Bruce Momjian (00:32)
• Re: pg_dump new -n flag Bruce Momjian (00:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] TCL_ARRAYS code in libpgtcl is pretty seriously broken Thomas G. Lockhart (00:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Bruce Momjian (00:57)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/doc/src/sgml protocol.sgml' Thomas G. Lockhart (01:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Tatsuo Ishii (02:04)
• vacuum analyze problem Oleg Bartunov (02:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum analyze problem Bruce Momjian (02:54)
• Re: pg_dump new -n flag Thomas G. Lockhart (03:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum analyze problem Thomas G. Lockhart (03:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! Marc G. Fournier (04:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] I can't find v6.4 Marc G. Fournier (04:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Marc G. Fournier (05:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Marc G. Fournier (05:05)
• Re: [ADMIN] COPY slows down; is it normal? Gene Selkov Jr. (05:21)
• Problem dumping PL/pgsql functions. Billy G. Allie (05:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Marc G. Fournier (05:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql is not ready for prime time Billy G. Allie (05:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Billy G. Allie (05:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem dumping PL/pgsql functions. Jan Wieck (07:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql is not ready for prime time Jan Wieck (07:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! Jan Wieck (08:35)
• cursoｒs in LLL Hiroshi Inoue (10:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! Terry Mackintosh (13:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump new -n flag Tom Lane (14:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] TCL_ARRAYS code in libpgtcl is pretty seriously broken Tom Lane (14:11)
• man-page install (was Re: pg_dump new -n flag) Tom Lane (14:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF) David Hartwig (14:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Tom Lane (14:36)
• Re: man-page install (was Re: pg_dump new -n flag) Thomas G. Lockhart (14:44)
• Default 'timestamp' value on HP-UX running Postgresql6.3.2 Sangeeta Rao (17:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] need help with csh Michael Meskes (17:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum analyze problem Thomas G. Lockhart (17:15)
• pg_dump and more Jan Wieck (17:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] need help with csh Patrick Welche (17:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Marc G. Fournier (18:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] TCL_ARRAYS code in libpgtcl is pretty seriously broken Massimo Dal Zotto (19:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] TCL_ARRAYS code in libpgtcl is pretty seriously broken Tom Lane (23:39)