Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers - March 2012

March 1, 2012

• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Alvaro Herrera (00:48)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Tom Lane (00:48)
• Re: Client Messages Fujii Masao (02:39)
• Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian (03:47)
• Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Shigeru Hanada (11:56)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas (12:41)
• Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Robert Haas (13:45)
• Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work Robert Haas (13:47)
• performance results on IBM POWER7 Robert Haas (14:54)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Alexander Korotkov (14:57)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Robert Haas (15:00)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Alvaro Herrera (15:09)
• Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Marko Kreen (16:14)
• Re: performance results on IBM POWER7 Ants Aasma (16:23)
• Allowing multi "-t" and adding "-n" to vacuumdb ? Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais (16:36)
• Re: performance results on IBM POWER7 Robert Haas (16:38)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Simon Riggs (16:40)
• Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Peter Eisentraut (17:00)
• Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib Peter Eisentraut (17:19)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Josh Berkus (17:42)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas (18:28)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Josh Berkus (18:40)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (19:46)
• Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Peter Eisentraut (20:17)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Heikki Linnakangas (20:49)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Tom Lane (21:08)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Peter Geoghegan (21:27)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (21:51)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Daniel Farina (21:57)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Josh Berkus (22:09)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Alvaro Herrera (22:12)
• Re: Allowing multi "-t" and adding "-n" to vacuumdb ? Tom Lane (22:13)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Nathan Boley (22:16)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (22:19)
• Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6 Jaime Casanova (22:34)
• Re: Allowing multi "-t" and adding "-n" to vacuumdb ? Kevin Grittner (22:40)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (22:44)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Nathan Boley (22:58)

March 2, 2012

• Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6 Marti Raudsepp (00:12)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas (00:23)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Alvaro Herrera (00:45)
• Re: review of: collation for (expr) Jaime Casanova (01:30)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Tom Lane (01:32)
• Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Shigeru Hanada (01:35)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas (01:46)
• Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian (02:04)
• Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian (02:06)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Tom Lane (02:11)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Peter Geoghegan (02:13)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (02:44)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas (03:52)
• Canceling ROLLBACK statement Pavan Deolasee (04:30)
• Re: Canceling ROLLBACK statement Tom Lane (05:01)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (08:29)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (08:30)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Simon Riggs (08:46)
• Re: Allowing multi "-t" and adding "-n" to vacuumdb ? Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais (09:26)
• autovacuum locks Gregg Jaskiewicz (10:44)
• Re: autovacuum locks Alvaro Herrera (11:03)
• Re: autovacuum locks Gregg Jaskiewicz (11:12)
• Re: autovacuum locks Gregg Jaskiewicz (11:22)
• Re: Bugs/slowness inserting and indexing cubes Heikki Linnakangas (11:25)
• Re: Website stylesheet for local docs Magnus Hagander (11:33)
• Re: Reducing bgwriter wakeups Heikki Linnakangas (12:42)
• Re: pg_basebackup -x stream from the standby gets stuck Magnus Hagander (13:26)
• Re: autovacuum locks Alvaro Herrera (14:25)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (14:46)
• Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup() Gilles Darold (15:05)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (15:07)
• Re: autovacuum locks Robert Haas (15:28)
• Re: autovacuum locks Tom Lane (15:36)
• Re: autovacuum locks Kevin Grittner (16:05)
• Re: ECPG FETCH readahead Noah Misch (16:41)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (16:54)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Peter Geoghegan (16:58)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Josh Berkus (17:35)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Tom Lane (17:48)
• Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Peter Eisentraut (18:37)
• Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Daniel Farina (18:53)
• Re: review of: collation for (expr) Peter Eisentraut (19:20)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Simon Riggs (19:32)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Robert Haas (19:36)
• Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Jeff Janes (19:45)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Simon Riggs (19:47)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Josh Berkus (19:56)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Tom Lane (20:10)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Tom Lane (20:13)
• Re: index-only quals vs. security_barrier views Noah Misch (20:17)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (20:36)
• sortsupport for text Robert Haas (20:45)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Noah Misch (20:58)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Kevin Grittner (21:12)
• Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Robert Haas (21:50)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Simon Riggs (21:56)
• Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Daniel Farina (22:07)
• Re: possible new option for wal_sync_method Dan Scales (22:28)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Dimitri Fontaine (22:32)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Simon Riggs (22:46)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Kevin Grittner (23:15)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (23:33)

March 3, 2012

• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Robert Haas (00:01)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (00:08)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Robert Haas (00:12)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 anarazel@anarazel.de (00:39)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (00:56)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (01:24)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (05:25)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (05:45)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (06:01)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (06:03)
• Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe" Simon Riggs (12:53)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Simon Riggs (13:14)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Petr Jelínek (13:26)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Dimitri Fontaine (13:45)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (14:03)
• Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label Yeb Havinga (14:12)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Dimitri Fontaine (14:26)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Dimitri Fontaine (14:34)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (15:37)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (15:55)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Kevin Grittner (16:12)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (16:21)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (18:04)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Kevin Grittner (18:37)
• BUG #6510: A simple prompt is displayed using wrong charset exclusion (18:44)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Dimitri Fontaine (19:25)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (19:42)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Simon Riggs (19:47)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (19:47)
• Patch: improve selectivity estimation for IN/NOT IN Daniele Varrazzo (19:52)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Simon Riggs (19:53)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (19:54)
• tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples Jeff Janes (20:22)
• Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Kevin Grittner (20:48)
• poll: CHECK TRIGGER? Alvaro Herrera (20:49)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (20:56)
• Re: Memory usage during sorting Jeff Janes (21:15)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (23:13)

March 4, 2012

• Re: archive_keepalive_command Jeff Janes (01:20)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (01:38)
• Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? Tom Lane (02:00)
• Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? Alvaro Herrera (02:23)
• Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe" Marti Raudsepp (02:28)
• Re: Patch: improve selectivity estimation for IN/NOT IN Tom Lane (02:38)
• Re: Patch: improve selectivity estimation for IN/NOT IN Daniele Varrazzo (03:20)
• Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work Tom Lane (05:20)
• Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" Brendan Jurd (06:36)
• Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" Tom Lane (06:53)
• Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe" Simon Riggs (09:59)
• Re: xlog location arithmetic Magnus Hagander (11:26)
• Re: xlog location arithmetic Magnus Hagander (11:26)
• Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" Brendan Jurd (11:55)
• Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe" Simon Riggs (13:02)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Alexander Korotkov (13:31)
• Re: Patch: improve selectivity estimation for IN/NOT IN Euler Taveira de Oliveira (13:44)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Alexander Korotkov (14:24)
• Re: Patch: improve selectivity estimation for IN/NOT IN Daniele Varrazzo (15:05)
• Re: ECPG FETCH readahead Boszormenyi Zoltan (15:33)
• Re: Patch review for logging hooks (CF 2012-01) Andrew Dunstan (15:45)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Andres Freund (15:50)
• Re: ECPG FETCH readahead Michael Meskes (16:16)
• Re: ECPG FETCH readahead Boszormenyi Zoltan (16:34)
• Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe" Simon Riggs (16:39)
• Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" Tom Lane (17:34)
• Re: Patch: improve selectivity estimation for IN/NOT IN Tom Lane (17:40)
• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Dimitri Fontaine (18:08)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (18:24)
• Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" hubert depesz lubaczewski (18:37)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (19:33)
• Re: autovacuum locks Greg Jaskiewicz (19:33)
• Re: xlog min recovery request ... is past current point ... Heikki Linnakangas (19:41)
• Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" Tom Lane (20:20)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (20:41)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane (21:11)

March 5, 2012

• Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown (00:33)
• Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work Robert Haas (01:53)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera (02:54)
• Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor) Tom Lane (03:52)
• Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" Brendan Jurd (03:55)
• Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" Robert Haas (06:23)
• Re: ECPG FETCH readahead Michael Meskes (08:26)
• Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Heikki Linnakangas (08:31)
• Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Shigeru Hanada (09:21)
• Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" Brendan Jurd (09:22)
• Re: autovacuum locks Gregg Jaskiewicz (10:06)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Simon Riggs (10:12)
• Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Etsuro Fujita (12:00)
• Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Etsuro Fujita (12:05)
• Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Shigeru Hanada (13:03)
• Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Andrew Dunstan (13:24)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (13:49)
• Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Alexander Korotkov (14:02)
• Re: autovacuum locks Kevin Grittner (14:34)
• Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs (15:03)
• Re: xlog min recovery request ... is past current point ... Robert Haas (15:32)
• Re: Patch review for logging hooks (CF 2012-01) Robert Haas (16:00)
• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule (16:02)
• Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? Robert Haas (16:03)
• Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? Pavel Stehule (16:07)
• elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Artur Litwinowicz (16:08)