Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Your account
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
User lists
Developer lists
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-www
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
pgsql-hackers - March 2000
Search archives
(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30
31
2000-03-01
Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'
The Hermit Hacker (01:11)
minor bug in 7.0: casting
The Hermit Hacker (01:14)
RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented
Hiroshi Inoue (01:35)
RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'
Hiroshi Inoue (02:05)
Re: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'
Bruce Momjian (02:42)
select exists (select oid from users)
The Hermit Hacker (03:17)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Christopher Sawtell (03:26)
Poll: Databases for Linux
The Hermit Hacker (04:02)
Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux
Bruce Momjian (04:20)
Re: [HACKERS] minor bug in 7.0: casting
Tom Lane (05:42)
RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'
Hiroshi Inoue (05:56)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Thomas Lockhart (06:14)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Bruce Momjian (06:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Tom Lane (06:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Thomas Lockhart (06:46)
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Thomas Lockhart (06:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Tom Lane (06:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Compile woes
Michael Meskes (07:27)
Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux
Oleg Broytmann (09:20)
RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented
Karel Zak - Zakkr (09:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Moray McConnachie (09:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Karel Zak - Zakkr (10:14)
RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'
Karel Zak - Zakkr (10:38)
Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta
Jose Soares (12:22)
Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta
Jose Soares (13:24)
rpms
Sergio A. Kessler (13:38)
Re: Bugs in Postgres
Thomas Lockhart (13:56)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Thomas Lockhart (14:00)
patch for plperl Makefile.PL
Mark Hollomon (14:17)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Sergio A. Kessler (14:25)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Sergio A. Kessler (14:39)
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Peter Eisentraut (14:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Peter Eisentraut (14:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Peter Eisentraut (15:03)
Where's the SQL3 spec?
Peter Eisentraut (15:04)
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Peter Eisentraut (15:15)
Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec?
Kardos, Dr. Andreas (15:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bugs in Postgres
Tom Lane (15:36)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Karel Zak - Zakkr (15:44)
BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Tom Lane (15:52)
PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc
Horák Daniel (16:01)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc
Oleg Broytmann (16:14)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Thomas Lockhart (16:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec?
Ross J. Reedstrom (16:35)
Re: bit types
Bruce Momjian (16:36)
Psql and \H option
Bruce Momjian (16:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Thomas Lockhart (16:49)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Lamar Owen (17:01)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types
Ross J. Reedstrom (17:24)
Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta
Tom Lane (17:50)
Locking
Jeff MacDonald (18:10)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Peter Eisentraut (18:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types
Tom Lane (18:46)
Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta
Tom Lane (19:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types
Ross J. Reedstrom (19:11)
Re: [HACKERS] patch for plperl Makefile.PL
Bruce Momjian (19:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types
Bruce Momjian (19:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types
Bruce Momjian (19:28)
SQL92 standard corrections
Ross J. Reedstrom (19:30)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Tom Lane (19:58)
empty dates and changing the default date behaviour
Willy De la Court (19:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
Hannu Krosing (20:13)
Re: bit types
Adriaan Joubert (20:23)
Re: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour
Tom Lane (20:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
Vince Vielhaber (20:24)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Bruce Momjian (20:26)
RE: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour
Willy De la Court (20:43)
2000-03-02
RE: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour
Willy De la Court (00:49)
Re: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour
Tom Lane (03:51)
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Tom Lane (04:18)
bitten by docs
Alfred Perlstein (04:33)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Thomas Lockhart (06:29)
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Thomas Lockhart (06:46)
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Thomas Lockhart (06:48)
AW: [HACKERS] Locking
Zeugswetter Andreas SB (08:54)
AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta
Zeugswetter Andreas SB (09:03)
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Vince Vielhaber (11:14)
grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Jerome ALET (11:47)
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Alfred Perlstein (11:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Peter Eisentraut (14:18)
Re: SQL compliance
Thomas Lockhart (14:48)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta
Tom Lane (15:12)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Karel Zak - Zakkr (15:12)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Karel Zak - Zakkr (15:16)
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Bruce Momjian (15:20)
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Bruce Momjian (15:24)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Peter Eisentraut (15:58)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc
Peter Eisentraut (16:13)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta
Peter Eisentraut (16:23)
SPI and qCache and bug?
Karel Zak - Zakkr (16:32)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Thomas Lockhart (16:38)
2000-03-03
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Sergio A. Kessler (12:39)
7.0beta bug (or feature)?
Kyle Bateman (18:19)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Henry B. Hotz (18:58)
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Lamar Owen (20:46)
2000-03-04
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Fernando Magari1os Lamas (00:42)
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Peter Eisentraut (17:05)
Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem
Peter Eisentraut (17:06)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Peter Eisentraut (17:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Peter Eisentraut (17:06)
ACL enhancements (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE)
Peter Eisentraut (17:07)
2000-03-05
TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime
Tatsuo Ishii (01:54)
DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Tatsuo Ishii (09:09)
Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta
Brian Hirt (09:26)
pg_pwd trigger to be removed
Peter Eisentraut (13:29)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Peter Eisentraut (13:36)
Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime
Peter Eisentraut (13:39)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta
Peter Eisentraut (14:15)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta
Brian Hirt (21:01)
2000-03-06
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Mike Mascari (01:31)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Mike Mascari (03:03)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Mike Mascari (05:44)
xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
Alexei Zakharov (06:06)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Peter Eisentraut (06:59)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta
Peter Eisentraut (07:05)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Philip Warner (07:27)
AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Zeugswetter Andreas SB (08:31)
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Jerome ALET (09:12)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Peter Eisentraut (10:08)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Peter Eisentraut (10:10)
AW: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Zeugswetter Andreas SB (10:27)
Re: ACL enhancements
Karel Zak - Zakkr (13:47)
Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme
Peter Eisentraut (15:59)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ACL enhancements
Ross J. Reedstrom (18:38)
Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime
Thomas Lockhart (23:12)
2000-03-07
sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Ross J. Reedstrom (00:37)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Tatsuo Ishii (01:07)
Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime
Tatsuo Ishii (01:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme
Bruce Momjian (03:31)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Ross J. Reedstrom (05:04)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Thomas Lockhart (05:16)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
yutaka tanida (05:25)
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Tom Lane (06:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem
Tom Lane (06:55)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Tom Lane (06:58)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Tom Lane (07:53)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Tatsuo Ishii (08:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta
Tom Lane (08:08)
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme
Tom Lane (08:15)
pSQL auth
Jacopo Silva (08:45)
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Jerome ALET (10:05)
alter_table.sql
Patrick Welche (14:52)
library policy question
Michael Meskes (14:57)
ECPG restructuring
Michael Meskes (15:09)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Thomas Lockhart (15:47)
How can I create trigger on system table, for on example pg_class ???
Andrzej Mazurkiewicz (16:14)
CREATE VIEW fix
Thomas Lockhart (16:14)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql
Tom Lane (16:19)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question
Tom Lane (16:34)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql
Patrick Welche (16:40)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Tom Lane (16:47)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question
Thomas Lockhart (16:57)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question
Lamar Owen (16:57)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql
Tom Lane (17:01)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql
Patrick Welche (17:22)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question
Michael Meskes (19:25)
SCHEMA support (was Re: DROP TABLE inside a transaction block)
Ross J. Reedstrom (19:25)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql
Tom Lane (19:29)
Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix
Ross J. Reedstrom (19:41)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Bruce Momjian (22:50)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question
The Hermit Hacker (23:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Tom Lane (23:22)
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Bruce Momjian (23:24)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Bruce Momjian (23:25)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Bruce Momjian (23:35)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed
Bruce Momjian (23:39)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Bruce Momjian (23:40)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
Bruce Momjian (23:48)
'LIKE' enhancement
JB (23:53)
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Bruce Momjian (23:53)
Casts in 7.0 vs 6.5 (was Re: [SQL] 7.0beta bug (or feature)?)
Tom Lane (23:59)
2000-03-08
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme
Bruce Momjian (00:00)
'LIKE' enhancement suggestion
JB (00:04)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Bruce Momjian (00:09)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
Bruce Momjian (00:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta
Tom Lane (00:15)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Bruce Momjian (00:17)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Bruce Momjian (00:17)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed
Tom Lane (00:22)
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion
Tom Lane (00:32)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Tom Lane (00:55)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
Tom Lane (01:01)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
The Hermit Hacker (01:08)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Tom Lane (01:13)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
The Hermit Hacker (01:19)
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion
JB (01:24)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question
Tom Lane (01:28)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Bruce Momjian (01:30)
Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix
Bruce Momjian (01:31)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question
Bruce Momjian (01:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Bruce Momjian (01:44)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Bruce Momjian (01:48)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
Bruce Momjian (01:50)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Bruce Momjian (01:51)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
D. Jay Newman (02:48)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Lamar Owen (02:57)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.
Tatsuo Ishii (03:03)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Bruce Momjian (04:53)
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion
Tom Lane (05:07)
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion
The Hermit Hacker (05:19)
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30
31
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group