Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers - October 1999

Oct. 1, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch Peter Eisentraut (00:49)
• Tricky query, tricky response Peter Eisentraut (01:03)
• Re: TO_CHAR() Thomas Lockhart (02:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Christof Petig (05:36)
• are subtransactions not nestable? Christof Petig (06:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Zakkr (07:43)
• pgbash-1.1.1 release SAKAIDA (08:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release Oleg Bartunov (11:38)
• problem compiling current sources with gcc 2.95.1 Oleg Bartunov (12:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release SAKAIDA Masaaki (14:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Thomas Lockhart (14:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable? Thomas Lockhart (15:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable? Bruce Momjian (15:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Jan Wieck (16:00)
• attribute distinct values estimate Roberto Cornacchia (16:11)
• Rexx interface po postgres ? Oleg Bartunov (18:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Keith Parks (19:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian (20:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane (21:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane (21:38)
• testing unsubscribe Jackson, DeJuan (22:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Keith Parks (22:55)

Oct. 2, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Roland Roberts (01:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release SAKAIDA (03:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release SAKAIDA (04:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch D'Arcy J.M. Cain (11:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Thomas Lockhart (14:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Tom Lane (15:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Thomas Lockhart (15:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch Tom Lane (15:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Tom Lane (17:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Tom Lane (18:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Doccumentation Patch for Create Function frankpit (18:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1 Tom Lane (18:24)
• getopt_long (was Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup ...) Peter Eisentraut (18:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Doccumentation Patch for Create Function Tom Lane (19:27)
• 'iscachable' only partially solves premature constant coercion Tom Lane (23:57)

Oct. 3, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Peter Eisentraut (05:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Thomas Lockhart (06:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions D'Arcy J.M. Cain (08:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Tom Lane (16:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Tom Lane (16:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Tom Lane (16:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 The Hermit Hacker (19:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 The Hermit Hacker (19:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 The Hermit Hacker (19:57)

Oct. 4, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Jan Wieck (11:16)
• Database names with spaces Peter Eisentraut (14:03)
• Status of 'now' column defaults Tom Lane (15:11)
• MATLAB mex file for PostgreSQL G. Anthony Reina (18:59)
• unsubscribe Frederick Cheeseborough (21:37)

Oct. 5, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Tom Lane (01:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] MATLAB mex file for PostgreSQL Thomas Lockhart (01:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Bruce Momjian (04:04)
• initdb problem on sun solaris sparc Geeta Mahesh (08:40)
• User types using large objects. Is it really possible? Jose Antonio Cotelo lema (08:44)
• RE: [HACKERS] Recovery on incomplete write Hiroshi Inoue (09:25)
• Questions about bufmgr Hiroshi Inoue (09:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Questions about bufmgr Vadim Mikheev (09:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Jan Wieck (09:43)
• How to add a new build-in operator Hiroshi Inoue (09:54)
• Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker (11:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator Thomas Lockhart (13:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart (13:59)
• Request inforamation Henry Molina (14:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Tom Lane (14:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane (14:46)
• 6.5.2 vacuum NOTICE messages Oleg Bartunov (14:58)
• CREATE RULE syntax simplification Tom Lane (15:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator Bruce Momjian (15:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (15:50)
• psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut (18:12)
• Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (18:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Peter Eisentraut (20:24)
• Error messages (was Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response) Peter Eisentraut (20:30)
• [No subject] Peter Eisentraut (20:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Oleg Bartunov (21:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces Bruce Momjian (21:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces Bruce Momjian (21:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Bruce Momjian (21:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane (22:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (22:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane (22:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (22:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces Tom Lane (22:42)

Oct. 6, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 vacuum NOTICE messages Vadim Mikheev (01:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker (01:23)
• libpq++ doc error? Vince Vielhaber (02:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces Bruce Momjian (03:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Roland Roberts (03:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Matthew N. Dodd (04:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (05:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Luuk de Boer (06:51)
• RE: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Ansley, Michael (07:46)
• AW: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (08:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker (13:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker (13:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (13:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart (13:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (13:54)
• psql and comments Thomas Lockhart (14:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error? Tom Lane (14:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Vince Vielhaber (14:15)
• RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Ansley, Michael (14:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane (14:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (14:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error? Vince Vielhaber (14:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Don Baccus (15:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker (15:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker (15:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut (16:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut (16:29)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut (16:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Bruce Momjian (18:17)
• union and LIMIT problem Oleg Bartunov (19:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian (19:23)
• Re: psql and comments Peter Eisentraut (19:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut (19:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces sszabo (20:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Database names with space (II) sszabo (20:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Bruce Momjian (22:22)
• WAL Bootstrap/Startup/Shutdown committed... Vadim Mikheev (22:28)
• [No subject] Tom Lane (23:00)

Oct. 7, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Roland Roberts (03:26)
• password in pg_shadow Zakkr (09:54)
• Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Hiroshi Inoue (09:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Jan Wieck (10:00)
• RE: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Zakkr (10:48)
• RE: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Peter Mount (11:14)
• (no subject) Alessio Bragadini (11:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart (13:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Thomas Lockhart (13:30)
• Privilege for attribute (columns) Zakkr (13:53)
• Re: PostgreSQL Help Jan Wieck (14:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane (14:34)
• RE: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL Help Peter Mount (14:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Peter Eisentraut (14:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart (15:27)
• Re: psql and comments Thomas Lockhart (15:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Bruce Momjian (16:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Bruce Momjian (16:17)
• Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian (16:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian (16:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Bruce Momjian (16:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (16:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Bruce Momjian (16:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Bruce Momjian (16:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Tom Lane (17:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Tom Lane (17:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian (17:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Tom Lane (17:45)
• Top N queries and disbursion Roberto Cornacchia (17:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Bruce Momjian (17:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Peter Eisentraut (21:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Peter Eisentraut (22:09)
• Re: Top N queries and disbursion Tom Lane (23:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Tom Lane (23:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Bruce Momjian (23:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Bruce Momjian (23:54)

Oct. 8, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL Help Tatsuo Ishii (01:34)
• Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (01:47)
• Cleanup of debugging flags, SSL Bruce Momjian (04:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Cleanup of debugging flags, SSL Bruce Momjian (04:26)
• Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (05:03)
• mysql-PostgreSQL comparisons Vince Vielhaber (11:16)
• RI status report #4 (come and join) Jan Wieck (12:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Roberto Cornacchia (13:18)
• RE: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Ansley, Michael (13:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane (13:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #4 (come and join) Brook Milligan (14:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #4 (come and join) Jan Wieck (14:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Tom Lane (14:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Tom Lane (14:29)
• Features for next release Thomas Lockhart (15:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Bruce Momjian (16:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Bruce Momjian (16:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Jan Wieck (16:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (16:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Bruce Momjian (16:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian (17:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian (17:15)
• Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Lamar Owen (17:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.] Bruce Momjian (18:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Michael Meskes (18:57)
• SPARC problem with WAL additions? Keith Parks (20:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane (22:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Tom Lane (23:14)

Oct. 9, 1999

• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (01:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Thomas Lockhart (02:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Thomas Lockhart (02:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Bruce Momjian (02:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Bruce Momjian (02:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Bruce Momjian (02:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Adriaan Joubert (09:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Bruce Momjian (10:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Bruce Momjian (12:50)
• Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian (12:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) Vince Vielhaber (13:03)
• memory problems in copying large table Martin Weinberg (14:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Martin Weinberg (15:02)