Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers - May 1999

1999-05-01

• A select with aggretion is failing, still subtle problems with aggregation Michael J Davis (01:20)
• locking... Vadim Mikheev (08:23)
• cluster truncates table name? Ulf Mehlig (11:16)
• DeadLockCheck... Vadim Mikheev (11:57)
• I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Vadim Mikheev (15:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] A select with aggretion is failing, still subtle problems with aggregation Tom Lane (15:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Vadim Mikheev (16:16)
• 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Oleg Bartunov (16:31)
• Re: Returned mail: User unknown Vadim Mikheev (16:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] patches for 6.5.0 Tom Lane (17:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane (19:06)
• Just a test Marc G. Fournier (19:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian (19:17)
• cache startup file Bruce Momjian (19:21)
• One test... The Hermit Hacker (19:59)
• Last test... The Hermit Hacker (20:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604 Tom Lane (20:26)
• Re: cache startup file Tom Lane (20:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Tom Lane (23:51)

1999-05-02

• Shouldn't this be invalid? Tom Lane (00:09)
• query dumping core Bruce Momjian (04:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] query dumping core Tom Lane (05:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii (12:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead (13:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii (14:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tom Lane (17:12)
• Re: [OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. KaTMiX (22:43)

1999-05-03

• GROUP BY fixes committed Tom Lane (00:54)
• (no subject) Thomas Malkus (08:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter T Mount (10:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter T Mount (11:01)
• an older problem? hash table out of memory Michael Contzen (12:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Tatsuo Ishii (14:08)
• Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again Frank Morton (14:10)
• Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again Herouth Maoz (14:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Tom Lane (14:29)
• problems with parser Massimo Dal Zotto (14:30)
• Jsut a test of mail relaying ... The Hermit Hacker (14:51)
• new patches for 6.5.0 Massimo Dal Zotto (16:06)
• XIDTAG ??? Vadim Mikheev (16:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Bruce Momjian (16:27)
• pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Ross J. Reedstrom (17:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Thomas Lockhart (17:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY fixes committed Thomas Lockhart (17:23)
• adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Oleg Bartunov (17:35)
• RE: [HACKERS] GROUP BY fixes committed Michael J Davis (17:57)
• error message JT Kirkpatrick (18:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] new patches for 6.5.0 Bruce Momjian (19:06)
• posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (19:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Tom Lane (22:57)
• subscribe Ciaran Dunn (23:39)
• [No subject] Ciaran Dunn (23:40)

1999-05-04

• Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Tom Lane (00:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Thomas Lockhart (02:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Todd Graham Lewis (02:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Bruce Momjian (04:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Bruce Momjian (04:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tatsuo Ishii (05:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (06:10)
• RE: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter Mount (07:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Massimo Dal Zotto (07:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? José Soares (12:05)
• Re: [INTERFACES] error message José Soares (12:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Thomas Lockhart (13:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Thomas Lockhart (13:12)
• [Fwd: Bug report.] Thomas Lockhart (13:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] problems with parser José Soares (13:23)
• varchar-array.patch applied Tom Lane (13:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Thomas Lockhart (13:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Tom Lane (14:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart (14:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Tom Lane (14:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] varchar-array.patch applied Thomas Lockhart (14:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? Todd Graham Lewis (14:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tatsuo Ishii (15:02)
• Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code Tom Lane (15:07)
• major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Dirk Lutzebaeck (15:30)
• RE: [INTERFACES] error message JT Kirkpatrick (15:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? Oleg Bartunov (15:46)
• Advice wanted on backend memory management Tom Lane (16:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Tom Lane (16:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] varchar-array.patch applied Bruce Momjian (16:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Bruce Momjian (16:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Bruce Momjian (17:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Bruce Momjian (17:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (18:01)
• Mirror mess... (urgent) Daniele Orlandi (18:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) Oleg Bartunov (18:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (19:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] varchar-array.patch appliedu Massimo Dal Zotto (19:27)
• ODBC with postgresql v6.5beta1 rheller (21:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) The Hermit Hacker (23:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) The Hermit Hacker (23:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory Tom Lane (23:45)

1999-05-05

• 6.4.2 core dumping. Christian (00:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Advice wanted on backend memory management Vadim Mikheev (01:18)
• || in v6.4.2 ... The Hermit Hacker (01:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Bruce Momjian (01:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] || in v6.4.2 ... Bruce Momjian (01:42)
• RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Hiroshi Inoue (02:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (03:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug (was Re: [SQL] Slow Inserts Again) Thomas Lockhart (06:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Dirk Lutzebaeck (07:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Dirk Lutzebaeck (07:54)
• new patches Massimo Dal Zotto (08:11)
• which guru know this ?? Carlos Peralta Ramirez (08:44)
• Small improvement Dmitry Samersoff (12:50)
• What does it mean? Dmitry Samersoff (12:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] error message José Soares (13:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane (13:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement Bruce Momjian (13:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Advice wanted on backend memory management Tom Lane (14:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mirror mess... (urgent) Michael Davis (14:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Advice wanted on backend memory management Michael Davis (14:18)
• RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Michael Davis (14:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Michael Davis (14:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] major flaw in 6.5beta1??? (UPDATE/INSERT waiting) Michael Davis (14:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement Michael Davis (14:21)
• Problem with function indexing Martin Weinberg (14:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (14:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Tom Lane (14:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane (15:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Bruce Momjian (15:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (15:33)
• unsubscribe problems Michael J Davis (16:25)
• Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc (fwd) Peter T Mount (18:28)
• RE: [GENERAL] which guru know this ?? Michael J Davis (19:52)
• dying backend processes postgres admin (20:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] new patches Bruce Momjian (21:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane (23:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem with function indexing Tom Lane (23:32)

1999-05-06

• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane (00:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Taral (01:50)
• Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Wayne Piekarski (03:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (03:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Bruce Momjian (05:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Bruce Momjian (05:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Bartunov (05:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Taral (06:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart (06:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Bruce Momjian (06:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Vadim Mikheev (07:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Bruce Momjian (07:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Vadim Mikheev (08:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] can't compile The Hermit Hacker (12:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] What does it mean? Jan Wieck (12:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) Tom Lane (14:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Tom Lane (14:20)
• the today question !!! Carlos Peralta Ramirez (14:24)
• RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... The Hermit Hacker (14:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load Oleg Broytmann (14:43)
• RE: [HACKERS] I'm planning some changes in lmgr... Michael J Davis (15:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Tom Lane (16:12)
• Hashjoin status report Tom Lane (16:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report The Hermit Hacker (17:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane (21:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane (21:33)

1999-05-07

• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report The Hermit Hacker (01:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Vadim Mikheev (01:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Vadim Mikheev (01:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report The Hermit Hacker (01:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tatsuo Ishii (02:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane (02:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Bruce Momjian (03:05)
• pg_dump problem? Chris Bitmead (03:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Bruce Momjian (03:49)
• Re:pg_dump barfs? Chris Bitmead (04:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Chris Bitmead (05:14)
• cvs 6.5 regression tests on Linux x86 Oleg Bartunov (06:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Chris Bitmead (07:20)
• AW: [HACKERS] cvs 6.5 regression tests on Linux x86 ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 (08:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Michael Contzen (10:11)
• Weird Errors in 6.4.2 - Indexes/Vacuuming Tim Perdue (11:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? D'Arcy J.M. Cain (11:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Chris Bitmead (12:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] cvs 6.5 regression tests on Linux x86 Tom Lane (13:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? geek+ (13:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Tom Lane (13:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Tom Lane (14:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Tom Lane (14:39)
• Functions for arrays !!!! Carlos Peralta Ramirez (14:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Chris Bitmead (15:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Chris Bitmead (15:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? geek+ (15:25)
• Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code Tom Lane (15:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code geek+ (16:18)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.c' Tom Lane (16:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code Tom Lane (18:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Tom Lane (21:16)
• NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Tom Lane (22:14)
• pg_dump doesn't dump NUMERIC precision info Tom Lane (22:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report Bruce Momjian (22:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs? Bruce Momjian (22:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem? Bruce Momjian (22:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code Bruce Momjian (23:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code] Bruce Momjian (23:03)

1999-05-08

• Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC type conversions leave much to be desired Thomas Lockhart (02:47)
• MVCC vacuum error Hiroshi Inoue (08:57)
• Date/Time Flaw in pg_dump ? Chris Bitmead (09:12)
• ODMG interface Chris Bitmead (09:32)