Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-hackers - April 1999

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 17 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

1999-04-01

Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Tom Lane (00:07)
Re: [PHP3] [OT]: SELECT COUNT(*) in Postgres Clark Evans (00:21)
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber (00:30)
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Tom Lane (00:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complexer join still persists sometimes Tom Lane (01:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Roland Roberts (03:16)

1999-04-17

UnixWare 7 patches for current CVS code. Billy G. Allie (20:39)

1999-04-19

adv: Important Psychic Message For You... silvia_brown (00:45)

1999-04-23

Re: [SQL] Finding the "most recent" rows Tom Lane (16:06)
what are postgresql limits? valter (18:43)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage -> PGSQL Advocacy The Hermit Hacker (18:52)
Re: [HACKERS] mailing list archives not updating The Hermit Hacker (18:54)
RE: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Vince Vielhaber (19:06)
PostgreSQL WWW Site ... The Hermit Hacker (19:13)
Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? The Hermit Hacker (19:25)
Re: [HACKERS] MVCC Question The Hermit Hacker (19:30)
List Archives ... The Hermit Hacker (19:31)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: mot_idx: cannot extend Bruce Momjian (19:34)
ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett (19:35)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage -> PGSQL Advocacy Bruce Momjian (19:41)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Finding the "most recent" rows Bruce Momjian (19:43)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling Bruce Momjian (19:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Bruce Momjian (19:54)
Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? Bruce Momjian (19:55)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: mot_idx: cannot extend Bruce Momjian (19:58)
I am feeling overwhelmed Bruce Momjian (19:58)
Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? valter (20:03)
Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster D'Arcy J.M. Cain (20:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster D'Arcy J.M. Cain (20:38)
Just catching up Bruce Momjian (20:45)
Keeping up Bruce Momjian (20:53)
problems with time zones in JDBC Andrew Merrill (20:53)
Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? Bruce Momjian (20:56)
Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Peter T Mount (21:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling Tom Lane (21:38)

1999-04-24

Re: [HACKERS] Low Performance Hannu Krosing (13:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Tom Lane (15:46)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Tom Lane (17:46)
[Fwd: [HACKERS] typeidTypeRelid Error] JP Rosevear (22:28)

1999-04-25

palloc at outer loop? Tom Lane (00:56)
Vacuum Crash Richard Lynch (02:17)
Efficiency of LIMIT ? Chris Bitmead (08:16)
Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum Crash Vadim Mikheev (15:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Adam Haberlach (18:49)
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Ryan Bradetich (19:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Bruce Momjian (19:41)
Functions with aggregations (i.e. group by) causes an abort Michael J Davis (21:08)

1999-04-26

Re: [HACKERS] Functions with aggregations (i.e. group by) causes an abort Tom Lane (00:46)
Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Tatsuo Ishii (02:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Cygwin32 fix for current Tatsuo Ishii (04:47)
Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Vadim Mikheev (06:57)
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Jan Wieck (06:57)
AW: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (07:00)
CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Mariusz Czułada (07:01)
Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Oleg Bartunov (07:40)
Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Oleg Bartunov (07:45)
decimal and numeric types José Soares (08:59)
Re: [HACKERS] regression output The Hermit Hacker (13:39)
psql bug ? José Soares (13:40)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett (14:18)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... The Hermit Hacker (14:38)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Jan Wieck (14:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Tom Lane (14:54)
Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? Tom Lane (14:57)
Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? Bruce Momjian (15:18)
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Jan Wieck (15:35)
CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Goran Thyni (15:52)
[Fwd: 6.5beta] Clayton Cottingham (16:16)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... The Hermit Hacker (16:39)
Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:06)
Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:14)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis (18:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis (18:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:20)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:20)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:25)
Quoting backticks golliher (18:39)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Michael Lausch (18:40)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis (18:45)
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Ryan Bradetich (18:57)
Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Clark Evans (19:00)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett (20:57)
RE: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as select distinct) Michael J Davis (23:05)

1999-04-27

RE: Mysql comparison Vince Vielhaber (01:07)
Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) G. Anthony Reina (01:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) Tim Perdue (01:24)
unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' Tatsuo Ishii (01:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Leslie Mikesell (01:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) The Hermit Hacker (02:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (02:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis (02:54)
Re: [HACKERS] MVCC Question Todd Graham Lewis (03:25)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Tom (03:44)
Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (03:49)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian (04:32)
HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Chris Bitmead (05:17)
Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? José Soares (07:19)
Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Jan Wieck (07:20)
numeric data type on 6.5 Tatsuo Ishii (09:10)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 D'Arcy J.M. Cain (09:37)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Tatsuo Ishii (09:48)
RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC and waiting for commit on a locked table in 6.4.2 Peter Mount (09:52)
fix for _copyUnique() Tatsuo Ishii (09:59)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Jan Wieck (10:05)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead (10:07)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead (10:18)
RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (10:24)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (10:48)
Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and waiting for commit on a locked table in6.4.2 Vadim Mikheev (10:52)
RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC and waiting for commit on a locked table in6.4.2 Peter Mount (11:28)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Jan Wieck (11:40)
Re: [GENERAL] unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' JP Rosevear (13:29)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Jan Wieck (13:37)
TRAP: Bad Argument to Function Call Brian P Millett (13:49)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart (13:52)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Oleg Broytmann (14:02)
Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Tom Lane (14:25)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart (14:28)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart (14:42)
Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Tom Lane (14:50)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Tom Lane (14:59)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' Tatsuo Ishii (15:02)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian (16:19)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Bruce Momjian (16:21)
Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt (16:22)
Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Jan Wieck (16:24)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (16:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Bruce Momjian (16:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Vince Vielhaber (17:00)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt (17:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt (17:09)
Re: [HACKERS] Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) G. Anthony Reina (17:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (19:54)
Issues with the latest 6.5 source Michael J Davis (21:31)
Looking for an old LabVIEW SQL toolkit licence... J.V. (21:39)

1999-04-28

Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Chris Bitmead (00:39)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart (03:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (03:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian (03:56)
rule plan string too big? Brook Milligan (04:32)
RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (05:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Tom Lane (06:00)
rules bug? Brook Milligan (06:54)
EGCS becomes GCC Oleg Broytmann (07:30)
Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Ryan Bradetich (07:36)
Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Dmitry Samersoff (07:54)
AW: [HACKERS] rules bug? Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (08:04)
Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Oleg Bartunov (08:38)
RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (09:57)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (10:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (11:01)
v6.5 Release Date ... The Hermit Hacker (12:07)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... Vince Vielhaber (12:11)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... The Hermit Hacker (12:31)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal José Soares (13:02)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Cary O'Brien (13:04)
Re: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Tom Lane (14:02)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] rules bug? Brook Milligan (14:19)
rule bug again Brook Milligan (15:38)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (16:04)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? The Hermit Hacker (16:18)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (17:57)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (17:58)
Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Michael Meskes (18:14)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Bruce Momjian (19:53)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Theo Kramer (20:07)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (20:34)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (20:46)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Vince Vielhaber (21:05)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Tom Lane (21:49)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Bruce Momjian (21:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Tom Lane (22:29)

1999-04-29

RE: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Michael J Davis (01:26)
[No subject] Atsushi Mano (01:59)
LIMIT Mr. Poet (05:22)
RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (05:35)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT Chris Bitmead (05:47)
FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Peter T Mount (05:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian (06:01)
RE: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Michael J Davis (06:03)
RE: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Peter Mount (07:31)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT Dirk Lutzebaeck (08:06)
Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows José Soares (08:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows Vadim Mikheev (08:47)
AW: [HACKERS] Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (08:59)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT Mark Jewiss (09:24)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Massimo Dal Zotto (09:28)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (11:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' Herouth Maoz (11:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows José Soares (13:14)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares (13:28)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares (13:55)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares (14:02)
Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Tom Lane (14:19)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT Mark Jewiss (14:57)
Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Brian P Millett (14:59)
Help/advice/suggestions on query optimizer for a large table Martin Weinberg (15:21)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart (15:21)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares (15:45)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Jan Wieck (16:06)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 17 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group