amcostestimate function is
given information describing a possible index scan, including
lists of WHERE and ORDER BY clauses that have been determined to
be usable with the index. It must return estimates of the cost of
accessing the index and the selectivity of the WHERE clauses
(that is, the fraction of parent-table rows that will be
retrieved during the index scan). For simple cases, nearly all
the work of the cost estimator can be done by calling standard
routines in the optimizer; the point of having an
amcostestimate function is to allow index
access methods to provide index-type-specific knowledge, in case
it is possible to improve on the standard estimates.
must have the signature:
void amcostestimate (PlannerInfo *root, IndexPath *path, double loop_count, Cost *indexStartupCost, Cost *indexTotalCost, Selectivity *indexSelectivity, double *indexCorrelation);
The first three parameters are inputs:
The planner's information about the query being processed.
The index access path being considered. All fields except cost and selectivity values are valid.
The number of repetitions of the index scan that should be factored into the cost estimates. This will typically be greater than one when considering a parameterized scan for use in the inside of a nestloop join. Note that the cost estimates should still be for just one scan; a larger loop_count means that it may be appropriate to allow for some caching effects across multiple scans.
The last four parameters are pass-by-reference outputs:
Set to cost of index start-up processing
Set to total cost of index processing
Set to index selectivity
Set to correlation coefficient between index scan order and underlying table's order
Note that cost estimate functions must be written in C, not in SQL or any available procedural language, because they must access internal data structures of the planner/optimizer.
The index access costs should be computed using the parameters used by src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c: a sequential disk block fetch has cost seq_page_cost, a nonsequential fetch has cost random_page_cost, and the cost of processing one index row should usually be taken as cpu_index_tuple_cost. In addition, an appropriate multiple of cpu_operator_cost should be charged for any comparison operators invoked during index processing (especially evaluation of the indexquals themselves).
The access costs should include all disk and CPU costs associated with scanning the index itself, but not the costs of retrieving or processing the parent-table rows that are identified by the index.
The "start-up cost" is the part of the total scan cost that must be expended before we can begin to fetch the first row. For most indexes this can be taken as zero, but an index type with a high start-up cost might want to set it nonzero.
The indexSelectivity should be set to the estimated fraction of the parent table rows that will be retrieved during the index scan. In the case of a lossy query, this will typically be higher than the fraction of rows that actually pass the given qual conditions.
The indexCorrelation should be set to the correlation (ranging between -1.0 and 1.0) between the index order and the table order. This is used to adjust the estimate for the cost of fetching rows from the parent table.
When loop_count is greater than one, the returned numbers should be averages expected for any one scan of the index.
A typical cost estimator will proceed as follows:
Estimate and return the fraction of parent-table rows
that will be visited based on the given qual conditions. In
the absence of any index-type-specific knowledge, use the
standard optimizer function
*indexSelectivity = clauselist_selectivity(root, path->indexquals, path->indexinfo->rel->relid, JOIN_INNER, NULL);
Estimate the number of index rows that will be visited during the scan. For many index types this is the same as indexSelectivity times the number of rows in the index, but it might be more. (Note that the index's size in pages and rows is available from the path->indexinfo struct.)
Estimate the number of index pages that will be retrieved during the scan. This might be just indexSelectivity times the index's size in pages.
Compute the index access cost. A generic estimator might do this:
/* * Our generic assumption is that the index pages will be read * sequentially, so they cost seq_page_cost each, not random_page_cost. * Also, we charge for evaluation of the indexquals at each index row. * All the costs are assumed to be paid incrementally during the scan. */ cost_qual_eval(&index_qual_cost, path->indexquals, root); *indexStartupCost = index_qual_cost.startup; *indexTotalCost = seq_page_cost * numIndexPages + (cpu_index_tuple_cost + index_qual_cost.per_tuple) * numIndexTuples;
However, the above does not account for amortization of index reads across repeated index scans.
Estimate the index correlation. For a simple ordered index on a single field, this can be retrieved from pg_statistic. If the correlation is not known, the conservative estimate is zero (no correlation).
Examples of cost estimator functions can be found in src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c.
Please use this form to add your own comments regarding your experience with particular features of PostgreSQL, clarifications of the documentation, or hints for other users. Please note, this is not a support forum, and your IP address will be logged. If you have a question or need help, please see the faq, try a mailing list, or join us on IRC. Note that submissions containing URLs or other keywords commonly found in 'spam' comments may be silently discarded. Please contact the webmaster if you think this is happening to you in error.
Proceed to the comment form.